<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308631</link>
    <description>The court found the detenu&#039;s arrest and custody illegal due to the violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. Despite this, the court directed the detenu&#039;s release on bail under specific conditions, including furnishing a bond and sureties, regular reporting to the Special Court, and obtaining permission before leaving the jurisdiction. The Habeas Corpus Petition was allowed based on these terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:46:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308631</link>
      <description>The court found the detenu&#039;s arrest and custody illegal due to the violation of Article 22(1) of the Constitution. Despite this, the court directed the detenu&#039;s release on bail under specific conditions, including furnishing a bond and sureties, regular reporting to the Special Court, and obtaining permission before leaving the jurisdiction. The Habeas Corpus Petition was allowed based on these terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>