https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33278 The court directed the 1st respondent to promptly decide on the petitioner's license extension request within eight weeks. The petitioner was instructed to maintain the bank guarantee for another year and inform the 2nd respondent accordingly. The decision on invoking the bank guarantee would be contingent on the Grievance Committee's determination regarding the license extension. The writ petition was disposed of with these directives, emphasizing the need to await the license extension decision before invoking the bank guarantee to balance the interests of both parties involved. en-us Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33278 The court directed the 1st respondent to promptly decide on the petitioner's license extension request within eight weeks. The petitioner was instructed to maintain the bank guarantee for another year and inform the 2nd respondent accordingly. The decision on invoking the bank guarantee would be contingent on the Grievance Committee's determination regarding the license extension. The writ petition was disposed of with these directives, emphasizing the need to await the license extension decision before invoking the bank guarantee to balance the interests of both parties involved. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33278