<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 59 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33277</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the appellate authority decide the stay petition expeditiously, while coercive recovery of the disputed tax was restrained until the stay petition is disposed of. The operative effect is interim protection against recovery pending consideration of stay, coupled with a prompt mandate for appellate determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 59 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33277</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the appellate authority decide the stay petition expeditiously, while coercive recovery of the disputed tax was restrained until the stay petition is disposed of. The operative effect is interim protection against recovery pending consideration of stay, coupled with a prompt mandate for appellate determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>