https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308626 Adjudication proceedings were kept in abeyance because the challenge raised a jurisdictional doubt linked to earlier proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the prior proceedings had concluded and that the appeal order had attained finality, so further adjudication on the same material should not continue. Pending counter and rejoinder, the Court protected the petitioner by staying the proceedings until the next date of listing. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308626 Adjudication proceedings were kept in abeyance because the challenge raised a jurisdictional doubt linked to earlier proceedings under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017. The petitioner argued that the prior proceedings had concluded and that the appeal order had attained finality, so further adjudication on the same material should not continue. Pending counter and rejoinder, the Court protected the petitioner by staying the proceedings until the next date of listing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308626