https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440084 The Tribunal set aside the demand of central excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods. Despite discrepancies in figures, the Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence establishing clandestine activities. Citing precedent cases, it was held that mere differences in figures are insufficient to sustain the charge without tangible proof. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 07:53:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440084 The Tribunal set aside the demand of central excise duty, interest, and penalty imposed on the appellant for alleged clandestine removal of goods. Despite discrepancies in figures, the Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence establishing clandestine activities. Citing precedent cases, it was held that mere differences in figures are insufficient to sustain the charge without tangible proof. The appellant's appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was overturned, granting consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440084