<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33269</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that Sales Tax collection cannot be considered turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC, aligning with a Supreme Court ruling. It remitted the issue of deduction for machinery replacement as revenue expenditure back for further examination due to insufficient evidence on production capacity impact. Similarly, the treatment of independent complete machinery replacement as revenue expenditure required more scrutiny. The Court emphasized the oversight of not considering the concept of Block of asset and directed a comprehensive reevaluation by the Commissioner of Appeals. The judgment stressed meticulous analysis and adherence to legal principles in determining deductions and expenditure classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33269</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that Sales Tax collection cannot be considered turnover for deduction u/s 80HHC, aligning with a Supreme Court ruling. It remitted the issue of deduction for machinery replacement as revenue expenditure back for further examination due to insufficient evidence on production capacity impact. Similarly, the treatment of independent complete machinery replacement as revenue expenditure required more scrutiny. The Court emphasized the oversight of not considering the concept of Block of asset and directed a comprehensive reevaluation by the Commissioner of Appeals. The judgment stressed meticulous analysis and adherence to legal principles in determining deductions and expenditure classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>