<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 351 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440078</link>
    <description>The AAR, West Bengal ruled that a taxpayer cannot claim input tax credit (ITC) on goods/services used for warehouse construction when such expenses are capitalized in books. The Authority held that the warehouse constitutes immovable property due to its permanent characteristics and lack of mobility. Since the applicant constructed the warehouse on his own account and retained ownership for providing rental/warehousing services, the restriction under Section 17(5)(d) of GST Act applies. The Authority distinguished the Safari Retreats case as factually different and denied ITC eligibility for construction-related inward supplies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 351 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440078</link>
      <description>The AAR, West Bengal ruled that a taxpayer cannot claim input tax credit (ITC) on goods/services used for warehouse construction when such expenses are capitalized in books. The Authority held that the warehouse constitutes immovable property due to its permanent characteristics and lack of mobility. Since the applicant constructed the warehouse on his own account and retained ownership for providing rental/warehousing services, the restriction under Section 17(5)(d) of GST Act applies. The Authority distinguished the Safari Retreats case as factually different and denied ITC eligibility for construction-related inward supplies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>