<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 341 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440068</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a case where the Revenue appealed against the higher rate of depreciation allowed on certain equipment. The ITAT found that the assessee, engaged in providing equipment and vehicles on hire, was entitled to claim the higher rate of depreciation. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing that the grounds raised lacked merit and were in line with a Co-ordinate Bench decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 341 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440068</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) in a case where the Revenue appealed against the higher rate of depreciation allowed on certain equipment. The ITAT found that the assessee, engaged in providing equipment and vehicles on hire, was entitled to claim the higher rate of depreciation. The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing that the grounds raised lacked merit and were in line with a Co-ordinate Bench decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>