<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 338 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440065</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reevaluate the addition of Rs. 26,88,000 under section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in light of the observations made. The ITAT concluded that the assessee had procured goods from the open market at a discounted rate and recorded them through bogus bills. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to restrict the addition by bringing the GP rate of bogus purchases at the same rate as genuine purchases, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:38:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 338 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440065</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to reevaluate the addition of Rs. 26,88,000 under section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in light of the observations made. The ITAT concluded that the assessee had procured goods from the open market at a discounted rate and recorded them through bogus bills. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to restrict the addition by bringing the GP rate of bogus purchases at the same rate as genuine purchases, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>