https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440026 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It found a violation of principles of natural justice in the order passed without considering submissions. The activities undertaken by the appellant were not considered as manufacturing based on legal interpretations. The Tribunal also held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable due to the appellant's registration and filing history. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, on 04.07.2023. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:36:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440026 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on all issues. It found a violation of principles of natural justice in the order passed without considering submissions. The activities undertaken by the appellant were not considered as manufacturing based on legal interpretations. The Tribunal also held that the extended period of limitation was inapplicable due to the appellant's registration and filing history. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any, on 04.07.2023. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440026