<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1620 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308603</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act was barred by limitation. The rectification should have been made within four years from the date of the original assessment order, and since it was not, the addition made by the AO was deleted. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718941" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1620 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308603</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming that the rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act was barred by limitation. The rectification should have been made within four years from the date of the original assessment order, and since it was not, the addition made by the AO was deleted. The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>