https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308619 Article 226 relief was found unwarranted where the grievance arose from insolvency proceedings governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which provides a complete remedial framework. Because the property owner had already approached the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 60(5), the writ petitioner lacked direct locus in the insolvency process. The public interest litigation was treated as an attempt to interfere with the statutory insolvency mechanism rather than a genuine exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, and it ought to have been rejected at the threshold. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jul 2023 07:36:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308619 Article 226 relief was found unwarranted where the grievance arose from insolvency proceedings governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which provides a complete remedial framework. Because the property owner had already approached the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 60(5), the writ petitioner lacked direct locus in the insolvency process. The public interest litigation was treated as an attempt to interfere with the statutory insolvency mechanism rather than a genuine exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, and it ought to have been rejected at the threshold. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 29 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308619