https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308601 The court upheld the legality of the petitioner's appointment as a lecturer on 31.7.1970, maintaining his seniority over respondent No. 5 who was promoted on 1.7.1972. The petitioner's service break did not impact his seniority, and the Joint Director of Education's order favoring respondent No. 5 was overturned. Consequently, the petitioner was recognized as the senior-most teacher eligible to act as the ad hoc/officiating Principal of the college. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Jul 2023 17:34:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308601 The court upheld the legality of the petitioner's appointment as a lecturer on 31.7.1970, maintaining his seniority over respondent No. 5 who was promoted on 1.7.1972. The petitioner's service break did not impact his seniority, and the Joint Director of Education's order favoring respondent No. 5 was overturned. Consequently, the petitioner was recognized as the senior-most teacher eligible to act as the ad hoc/officiating Principal of the college. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308601