<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 227 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33258</link>
    <description>In service tax appeals, the interim question was whether the appellants had shown a sufficiently strong prima facie case to obtain complete waiver of the statutory pre-deposit. The tribunal noted that the disputes required deeper examination on merits at the final hearing, but that stage had not yet been reached. On the material before it, complete waiver was not justified, and the appellants were directed to make a partial pre-deposit before the appeals could proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 227 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33258</link>
      <description>In service tax appeals, the interim question was whether the appellants had shown a sufficiently strong prima facie case to obtain complete waiver of the statutory pre-deposit. The tribunal noted that the disputes required deeper examination on merits at the final hearing, but that stage had not yet been reached. On the material before it, complete waiver was not justified, and the appellants were directed to make a partial pre-deposit before the appeals could proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>