https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440018 HC rejected the applicant's plea for anticipatory bail in an alleged GST refund fraud involving bogus firms and unclaimed exports to Dubai. The court noted material indicating the applicant was the main accused, based on statements of co-accused and evidence of sales and purchases through about 25 fictitious firms. The applicant's non-appearance despite three summons under Section 70 CGST Act weighed against relief. Relying on SC precedent that economic offences with deep-rooted conspiracies and huge public loss are grave, HC held no case was made for anticipatory bail and dismissed the application. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440018 HC rejected the applicant's plea for anticipatory bail in an alleged GST refund fraud involving bogus firms and unclaimed exports to Dubai. The court noted material indicating the applicant was the main accused, based on statements of co-accused and evidence of sales and purchases through about 25 fictitious firms. The applicant's non-appearance despite three summons under Section 70 CGST Act weighed against relief. Relying on SC precedent that economic offences with deep-rooted conspiracies and huge public loss are grave, HC held no case was made for anticipatory bail and dismissed the application. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440018