https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439979 Recruitment notifications for Members of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions were invalid because they relied on eligibility and selection rules that had already been struck down as unconstitutional and had not been stayed; once those rules were effaced, any selection process founded on them lacked legal basis. A later Supreme Court protective order did not save the notifications, as it applied only to processes already initiated or substantially advanced before that order and did not cover later-issued notifications where recruitment had not commenced. The writ petitions were allowed, the notifications were quashed, and fresh action was directed in accordance with the governing recruitment directions. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2023 15:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439979 Recruitment notifications for Members of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions were invalid because they relied on eligibility and selection rules that had already been struck down as unconstitutional and had not been stayed; once those rules were effaced, any selection process founded on them lacked legal basis. A later Supreme Court protective order did not save the notifications, as it applied only to processes already initiated or substantially advanced before that order and did not cover later-issued notifications where recruitment had not commenced. The writ petitions were allowed, the notifications were quashed, and fresh action was directed in accordance with the governing recruitment directions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439979