https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308597 A claim filed after Committee of Creditors approval of a resolution plan was rejected, and the Court declined to interfere with the concurrent orders of the adjudicating authority and appellate tribunal, noting the plan's approval and the later filing of the claim. The Court referred to Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. but maintained the dismissal of the application. It also recorded that the appellant remains at liberty to pursue any other remedy available under law, preserving alternative statutory or legal recourse notwithstanding rejection of the present challenge. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2023 21:56:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308597 A claim filed after Committee of Creditors approval of a resolution plan was rejected, and the Court declined to interfere with the concurrent orders of the adjudicating authority and appellate tribunal, noting the plan's approval and the later filing of the claim. The Court referred to Ghanashyam Mishra and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. but maintained the dismissal of the application. It also recorded that the appellant remains at liberty to pursue any other remedy available under law, preserving alternative statutory or legal recourse notwithstanding rejection of the present challenge. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308597