<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1246 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308595</link>
    <description>A written memorandum of understanding proving an outstanding liability can displace a bare denial of debt, especially where its genuineness is unchallenged and oral assertions cannot contradict the written terms under the Evidence Act. Statutory presumptions of consideration and liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act continue unless rebutted by evidence. A cheque described as a security cheque is not outside Section 138 if it is linked to an existing and crystallized liability that remains unpaid when the cheque is issued or presented. On that basis, dishonour may attract criminal liability where the drawer fails to rebut the presumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 21:56:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1246 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308595</link>
      <description>A written memorandum of understanding proving an outstanding liability can displace a bare denial of debt, especially where its genuineness is unchallenged and oral assertions cannot contradict the written terms under the Evidence Act. Statutory presumptions of consideration and liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act continue unless rebutted by evidence. A cheque described as a security cheque is not outside Section 138 if it is linked to an existing and crystallized liability that remains unpaid when the cheque is issued or presented. On that basis, dishonour may attract criminal liability where the drawer fails to rebut the presumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>