<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 229 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim by a PSU Unit, citing Section 11B of the Central Excise Act and the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed based on the time-bar issue, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory provisions and departmental approval for refund claims, regardless of the reason for the refund. The decision reiterated the requirement to demonstrate non-passing of duty incidence and highlighted the significance of following legal principles and precedents in refund matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 229 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim by a PSU Unit, citing Section 11B of the Central Excise Act and the doctrine of unjust enrichment. The appeal was dismissed based on the time-bar issue, emphasizing the need for compliance with statutory provisions and departmental approval for refund claims, regardless of the reason for the refund. The decision reiterated the requirement to demonstrate non-passing of duty incidence and highlighted the significance of following legal principles and precedents in refund matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>