<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 83 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the assessee for failures related to registration, payment of service tax, filing returns, and suppressing taxable service value. Despite the assessee&#039;s claim of ignorance of service tax liability, the Tribunal found that the assessee was aware of the penal provisions, as evidenced by paying all penalties without claiming Section 80 benefits. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 80 and affirmed the penalty imposed by the Commissioner. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the liability of the appellants to pay the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 83 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed by the Commissioner under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the assessee for failures related to registration, payment of service tax, filing returns, and suppressing taxable service value. Despite the assessee&#039;s claim of ignorance of service tax liability, the Tribunal found that the assessee was aware of the penal provisions, as evidenced by paying all penalties without claiming Section 80 benefits. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the appellants were not entitled to the benefit of Section 80 and affirmed the penalty imposed by the Commissioner. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the liability of the appellants to pay the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>