https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439943 Allegations of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, concealment of control over shareholder companies, and challenge to the validity of share allotment and recording in the register raised contested questions of title and fraud that required evidence. The dispute was not confined to a simple proceeding for refusal of registration or rectification under Sections 58 and 59 of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 430 did not oust civil jurisdiction on these facts because the matter was not within the Tribunal's exclusive domain. The suit was therefore maintainable before the civil court, and the challenge to civil court jurisdiction failed. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jul 2023 07:56:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439943 Allegations of fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, concealment of control over shareholder companies, and challenge to the validity of share allotment and recording in the register raised contested questions of title and fraud that required evidence. The dispute was not confined to a simple proceeding for refusal of registration or rectification under Sections 58 and 59 of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 430 did not oust civil jurisdiction on these facts because the matter was not within the Tribunal's exclusive domain. The suit was therefore maintainable before the civil court, and the challenge to civil court jurisdiction failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439943