<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33233</link>
    <description>A clearing and forwarding agent was held not to be a professional firm for income-tax purposes because its work is limited to documentation and facilitating clearance of goods, rather than a profession based on intellectual attainments, specialised skill, or higher learning. The court followed its earlier binding decision in the same assessee&#039;s case and the Supreme Court authority relied on there. The question was answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33233</link>
      <description>A clearing and forwarding agent was held not to be a professional firm for income-tax purposes because its work is limited to documentation and facilitating clearance of goods, rather than a profession based on intellectual attainments, specialised skill, or higher learning. The court followed its earlier binding decision in the same assessee&#039;s case and the Supreme Court authority relied on there. The question was answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>