<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 147 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision in a case involving the denial of abatement of 75% from the value of Service Tax under Notification No. 32/2004. The respondents, categorized as Goods Transport Agents, had paid Service Tax based on the notification, which the Revenue challenged. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere, emphasizing the importance of meeting notification conditions and providing necessary certificates for abatement claims. The appeal was dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s contentions were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 147 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (A)&#039;s decision in a case involving the denial of abatement of 75% from the value of Service Tax under Notification No. 32/2004. The respondents, categorized as Goods Transport Agents, had paid Service Tax based on the notification, which the Revenue challenged. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere, emphasizing the importance of meeting notification conditions and providing necessary certificates for abatement claims. The appeal was dismissed, and the Revenue&#039;s contentions were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>