<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 177 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439904</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the penalty orders and remitting the matters back to the first respondent for reconsideration, with directions to afford a personal hearing to the petitioner. The court found a partial violation of natural justice and held the writ petition maintainable. The petitioner was required to deposit 25% of the penalty amount within six weeks. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 08:01:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 177 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439904</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the penalty orders and remitting the matters back to the first respondent for reconsideration, with directions to afford a personal hearing to the petitioner. The court found a partial violation of natural justice and held the writ petition maintainable. The petitioner was required to deposit 25% of the penalty amount within six weeks. No costs were awarded, and pending applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>