<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was not justified as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of meeting the conditions specified in the Act before penalizing for such offenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was not justified as there was no concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of meeting the conditions specified in the Act before penalizing for such offenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>