<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 2026 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308574</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata, in a judgment by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal based solely on Sales Tax Returns figures. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence to prove clandestine activities, citing precedent decisions. Mrs. Wadhwa found the lower authorities&#039; reliance on Sales Tax Returns alone unjustified and noted the lack of investigation by the Revenue. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, disagreeing with the Revenue&#039;s reliance on precedent decisions and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 22:23:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 2026 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308574</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata, in a judgment by Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal based solely on Sales Tax Returns figures. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence to prove clandestine activities, citing precedent decisions. Mrs. Wadhwa found the lower authorities&#039; reliance on Sales Tax Returns alone unjustified and noted the lack of investigation by the Revenue. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, disagreeing with the Revenue&#039;s reliance on precedent decisions and granted consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>