<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33222</link>
    <description>MAT credit under Section 115JAA must be adjusted before interest is computed under Sections 234B and 234C, because the credit is intended to reduce tax liability and not tax plus interest. The Court also held that Rule 12(1)(a) and Form I cannot override the Act or alter the statutory order of adjustment of tax credits and tax payments. On that basis, the issues were answered in favour of the assessee and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 04:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 45 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33222</link>
      <description>MAT credit under Section 115JAA must be adjusted before interest is computed under Sections 234B and 234C, because the credit is intended to reduce tax liability and not tax plus interest. The Court also held that Rule 12(1)(a) and Form I cannot override the Act or alter the statutory order of adjustment of tax credits and tax payments. On that basis, the issues were answered in favour of the assessee and the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>