<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 646 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application filed by M/s. Gujarat Raffia Industries Ltd., setting aside the penalty imposed on them. The Tribunal found a mistake in the Final Order as no specific finding on the penalty was recorded, despite the appellant&#039;s plea. It was determined that no penalty was warranted as the goods were not clandestinely removed and the classification list was filed correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2023 17:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 646 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the rectification application filed by M/s. Gujarat Raffia Industries Ltd., setting aside the penalty imposed on them. The Tribunal found a mistake in the Final Order as no specific finding on the penalty was recorded, despite the appellant&#039;s plea. It was determined that no penalty was warranted as the goods were not clandestinely removed and the classification list was filed correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>