https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308555 The court upheld the decree for Rs. 8,000 in favor of the plaintiff as the defendant failed to prove the hundis were for accommodation, maintaining the statutory presumption of consideration under Section 118. The defendant's counter-claim for the return of the hundis was dismissed. The appeal was denied with costs, and cross-objections on trial court costs were also dismissed. en-us Wed, 10 Nov 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jul 2023 12:32:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308555 The court upheld the decree for Rs. 8,000 in favor of the plaintiff as the defendant failed to prove the hundis were for accommodation, maintaining the statutory presumption of consideration under Section 118. The defendant's counter-claim for the return of the hundis was dismissed. The appeal was denied with costs, and cross-objections on trial court costs were also dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Nov 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308555