<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33217</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed all appeals related to the disallowance of provisions for bad debts and non-performing assets, disallowance of preliminary expenses under Section 35(D), and entitlement to amortization of preliminary expenses. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, citing previous judgments against the assessee in similar cases. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 40 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33217</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed all appeals related to the disallowance of provisions for bad debts and non-performing assets, disallowance of preliminary expenses under Section 35(D), and entitlement to amortization of preliminary expenses. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, citing previous judgments against the assessee in similar cases. The appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>