<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33215</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the 2004 Regulations and the notification inviting applications for Customs House Agents (CHA) licences. However, it directed the Central Board of Excise and Customs to consider extending similar benefits to the petitioners as granted to individuals in Delhi and Punjab, emphasizing the importance of uniformity and fairness in implementing regulations across regions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33215</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the challenge to the 2004 Regulations and the notification inviting applications for Customs House Agents (CHA) licences. However, it directed the Central Board of Excise and Customs to consider extending similar benefits to the petitioners as granted to individuals in Delhi and Punjab, emphasizing the importance of uniformity and fairness in implementing regulations across regions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>