https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439844 The appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the suit property was not purchased as a benami transaction and that the plaintiff was entitled to recovery of possession. The defendants were found to be permissive occupants, and they were directed to submit a statement of accounts. The court rejected the defendants' claim of adverse possession and ordered them to hand over possession of the property to the plaintiff within three months. en-us Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jul 2023 23:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439844 The appellate court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, determining that the suit property was not purchased as a benami transaction and that the plaintiff was entitled to recovery of possession. The defendants were found to be permissive occupants, and they were directed to submit a statement of accounts. The court rejected the defendants' claim of adverse possession and ordered them to hand over possession of the property to the plaintiff within three months. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 26 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439844