<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 105 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for wrong availment of Cenvat credit on capital goods was unsustainable as the manufacturer had the option to defer credit utilization. Additionally, the show cause notice was deemed time-barred, as it was issued after the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 22:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 105 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for wrong availment of Cenvat credit on capital goods was unsustainable as the manufacturer had the option to defer credit utilization. Additionally, the show cause notice was deemed time-barred, as it was issued after the limitation period. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>