<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308544</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Scrutiny Committee&#039;s order invalidating the tribe claims and recalling the validity certificates. The Court found that the Petitioners suppressed material facts, including the invalidation of tribe claims of their close relatives, and submitted incomplete information, violating the requirement for genuine disclosure. The Court held that the Scrutiny Committee had issued proper notices, and the Petitioners&#039; failure to respond could not be a defense. Consequently, the Court concluded that the Petitioners&#039; claims lacked merit, affirming the Committee&#039;s actions as within its jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 20:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308544</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the Scrutiny Committee&#039;s order invalidating the tribe claims and recalling the validity certificates. The Court found that the Petitioners suppressed material facts, including the invalidation of tribe claims of their close relatives, and submitted incomplete information, violating the requirement for genuine disclosure. The Court held that the Scrutiny Committee had issued proper notices, and the Petitioners&#039; failure to respond could not be a defense. Consequently, the Court concluded that the Petitioners&#039; claims lacked merit, affirming the Committee&#039;s actions as within its jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>