<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33209</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue department regarding the allowability of expenditure on renting and maintaining a guest house as a business expenditure, citing legislative intent and a Supreme Court decision. The Court also held that sales tax and excise duty cannot be included in the total turnover for calculating benefits under section 80HHC, following a schematic interpretation. Regarding deductions for replacement of machinery and purchase of templates, the Court remanded the matter for further consideration based on legal principles established by the Supreme Court. The Court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and judicial decisions in determining tax implications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 34 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33209</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the revenue department regarding the allowability of expenditure on renting and maintaining a guest house as a business expenditure, citing legislative intent and a Supreme Court decision. The Court also held that sales tax and excise duty cannot be included in the total turnover for calculating benefits under section 80HHC, following a schematic interpretation. Regarding deductions for replacement of machinery and purchase of templates, the Court remanded the matter for further consideration based on legal principles established by the Supreme Court. The Court emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and judicial decisions in determining tax implications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>