<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 102 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439829</link>
    <description>Conviction for murder and criminal intimidation was found unsafe where the prosecution relied mainly on a closely related chance witness whose section 161 statement materially differed from his trial testimony. The witness&#039;s explanation of his presence, his conduct after the , and the sequence of events were inconsistent, while delay in recording his statement, lack of corroborative recovery of the motorcycle, and non-examination of independent witnesses further weakened the case. Medical evidence suggesting semi-digested food, along with another witness&#039;s account, created doubt about the time of occurrence. The later prosecution improvements were found unreliable, and the conviction was held unsustainable, resulting in acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 102 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439829</link>
      <description>Conviction for murder and criminal intimidation was found unsafe where the prosecution relied mainly on a closely related chance witness whose section 161 statement materially differed from his trial testimony. The witness&#039;s explanation of his presence, his conduct after the , and the sequence of events were inconsistent, while delay in recording his statement, lack of corroborative recovery of the motorcycle, and non-examination of independent witnesses further weakened the case. Medical evidence suggesting semi-digested food, along with another witness&#039;s account, created doubt about the time of occurrence. The later prosecution improvements were found unreliable, and the conviction was held unsustainable, resulting in acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>