https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308531 The tribunal upheld the duty liability on the appellant for diesel generating sets' body covers, dismissing the appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 106/2007. The appellant's attempt to evade duty payment through a conspiracy with the job worker was deemed unacceptable, leading to the affirmation of duty liability to protect Revenue's interest. The judgment was delivered on 6-2-2018, confirming the appellant's responsibility for payment of Central Excise duty in the job work scenario. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:39:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308531 The tribunal upheld the duty liability on the appellant for diesel generating sets' body covers, dismissing the appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 106/2007. The appellant's attempt to evade duty payment through a conspiracy with the job worker was deemed unacceptable, leading to the affirmation of duty liability to protect Revenue's interest. The judgment was delivered on 6-2-2018, confirming the appellant's responsibility for payment of Central Excise duty in the job work scenario. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308531