<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 98 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439825</link>
    <description>GST registration cancellation was challenged on the ground that the show cause notice was uploaded with an unusually short returnable time, depriving the taxpayer of a fair opportunity to respond. The cancellation order also went beyond the scope of the notice. On these facts, the Bombay High Court treated the action as arbitrary and contrary to natural justice, and set aside both the notice and the cancellation order while permitting a fresh notice in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 98 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439825</link>
      <description>GST registration cancellation was challenged on the ground that the show cause notice was uploaded with an unusually short returnable time, depriving the taxpayer of a fair opportunity to respond. The cancellation order also went beyond the scope of the notice. On these facts, the Bombay High Court treated the action as arbitrary and contrary to natural justice, and set aside both the notice and the cancellation order while permitting a fresh notice in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>