<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 96 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439823</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST tax order, quashing the original demand against a hardware dealer. The court found procedural irregularities in the tax assessment, specifically the lack of proper hearing and incorrect claims about a supplier&#039;s non-existence. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with the petitioner directed to submit supporting documentation within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 96 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439823</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging GST tax order, quashing the original demand against a hardware dealer. The court found procedural irregularities in the tax assessment, specifically the lack of proper hearing and incorrect claims about a supplier&#039;s non-existence. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with the petitioner directed to submit supporting documentation within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>