https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33202 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to impose a deposit condition after a remand order in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was determined that the condition was not considered a pre-deposit for a fresh hearing, and there was no legal impediment for the Tribunal to impose such conditions. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and compliance with legal provisions during remands. en-us Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2011 18:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33202 The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to impose a deposit condition after a remand order in an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was determined that the condition was not considered a pre-deposit for a fresh hearing, and there was no legal impediment for the Tribunal to impose such conditions. The appeal was dismissed as it did not raise any substantial question of law, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing and compliance with legal provisions during remands. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33202