<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439812</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to decide on the pending rectification application within six weeks from the date of the judgment. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek further legal remedies if the decision by the JAO was unfavorable. The pending application was to be closed, and parties were instructed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 85 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439812</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer to decide on the pending rectification application within six weeks from the date of the judgment. The petitioner was granted liberty to seek further legal remedies if the decision by the JAO was unfavorable. The pending application was to be closed, and parties were instructed to act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>