<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of custom duty due to lack of concrete evidence and contributory negligence by both the appellant and Customs department. However, the penalty was confirmed but reduced to Rs. 50,000. The appeal was allowed in part, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:37:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 68 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of custom duty due to lack of concrete evidence and contributory negligence by both the appellant and Customs department. However, the penalty was confirmed but reduced to Rs. 50,000. The appeal was allowed in part, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>