<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 67 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order revoking the Customs Broker License of Maj Shipping Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal held that the revocation was based on incorrect grounds beyond the scope of the inquiry report. It was found that the appellant had complied with the verification requirements under Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018, and physical verification was not mandatory. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order dated 16.08.2022 was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 67 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order revoking the Customs Broker License of Maj Shipping Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal held that the revocation was based on incorrect grounds beyond the scope of the inquiry report. It was found that the appellant had complied with the verification requirements under Regulation 10(n) of CBLR, 2018, and physical verification was not mandatory. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order dated 16.08.2022 was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>