<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 66 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439793</link>
    <description>Section 7 insolvency admission depends on proof of a financial debt and default, not on a full adjudication of the underlying money dispute. The text states that the corporate debtor had availed financial facilities, the account was treated as non-performing, and later debt recovery proceedings fixed an amount payable; the operative appellate quantification left an unpaid sum above the statutory threshold. A dispute over the exact quantum did not negate debt or default. An interim High Court injunction against coercive recovery did not bar initiation of CIRP or prevent the adjudicating authority from proceeding under the IBC, because insolvency resolution is distinct from recovery litigation. The Section 7 application was therefore maintainable and the admission order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 66 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439793</link>
      <description>Section 7 insolvency admission depends on proof of a financial debt and default, not on a full adjudication of the underlying money dispute. The text states that the corporate debtor had availed financial facilities, the account was treated as non-performing, and later debt recovery proceedings fixed an amount payable; the operative appellate quantification left an unpaid sum above the statutory threshold. A dispute over the exact quantum did not negate debt or default. An interim High Court injunction against coercive recovery did not bar initiation of CIRP or prevent the adjudicating authority from proceeding under the IBC, because insolvency resolution is distinct from recovery litigation. The Section 7 application was therefore maintainable and the admission order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>