<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33199</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals challenging orders under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act. It upheld the revisional authority&#039;s order timeline compliance with the Finance Act provisions, emphasizing that acting within the two-year timeframe suffices, and subsequent proceedings do not extend the limitation period. The judgment clarifies the interpretation of Section 84(5) of the Finance Act, ensuring legal compliance and procedural adherence in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 26 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33199</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals challenging orders under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act. It upheld the revisional authority&#039;s order timeline compliance with the Finance Act provisions, emphasizing that acting within the two-year timeframe suffices, and subsequent proceedings do not extend the limitation period. The judgment clarifies the interpretation of Section 84(5) of the Finance Act, ensuring legal compliance and procedural adherence in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>