<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 57 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It found the service tax demands on convention services, annual general meetings, balance sheet differences, reimbursement of electricity charges, and the Modular Employment Scheme unsustainable. The show cause notice was deemed vague, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation unjustified. Consequently, penalties were not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 57 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal. It found the service tax demands on convention services, annual general meetings, balance sheet differences, reimbursement of electricity charges, and the Modular Employment Scheme unsustainable. The show cause notice was deemed vague, and the invocation of the extended period of limitation unjustified. Consequently, penalties were not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>