<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 51 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439778</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand for dredging service and Commercial or Industrial Construction Service but confirmed the demand for consulting engineer service, transport of goods by road services, and consulting engineer&#039;s services (import of services). Penalties imposed were set aside due to reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant, with the Tribunal&#039;s order pronounced on 08.05.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:36:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 51 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439778</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the service tax demand for dredging service and Commercial or Industrial Construction Service but confirmed the demand for consulting engineer service, transport of goods by road services, and consulting engineer&#039;s services (import of services). Penalties imposed were set aside due to reasonable cause for non-payment of service tax. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the appellant, with the Tribunal&#039;s order pronounced on 08.05.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>