<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439775</link>
    <description>Eligibility for the 1% concessional duty rate under Notification No. 1/2011-CE depended on compliance with the condition against availment of CENVAT credit. The assessee had initially taken credit on inputs and input services but later reversed the proportionate credit attributable to the exempted goods and paid interest, which was supported by verification. That reversal was treated as sufficient compliance with the notification condition, so the exclusion from exemption could not be sustained and the demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 48 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439775</link>
      <description>Eligibility for the 1% concessional duty rate under Notification No. 1/2011-CE depended on compliance with the condition against availment of CENVAT credit. The assessee had initially taken credit on inputs and input services but later reversed the proportionate credit attributable to the exempted goods and paid interest, which was supported by verification. That reversal was treated as sufficient compliance with the notification condition, so the exclusion from exemption could not be sustained and the demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>