https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439764 A judgment rendered by a competent court under the law then in force cannot be treated as non est merely because a later Full Bench adopts a different forum position; the proper course is to challenge it through the available appellate or revisional remedy, and the accused's revision could be treated as an appeal and examined on merits. In the cheque dishonour dispute, the cheque bore the accused's signature and the surrounding circumstances supported the complainant's loan version, while the accused's blank-cheque defence was unsupported by reliable evidence and did not rebut the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The conviction was sustained. en-us Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:35:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439764 A judgment rendered by a competent court under the law then in force cannot be treated as non est merely because a later Full Bench adopts a different forum position; the proper course is to challenge it through the available appellate or revisional remedy, and the accused's revision could be treated as an appeal and examined on merits. In the cheque dishonour dispute, the cheque bore the accused's signature and the surrounding circumstances supported the complainant's loan version, while the accused's blank-cheque defence was unsupported by reliable evidence and did not rebut the presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The conviction was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439764