<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 19 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439746</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the disallowance of deduction for provision for leave encashment for the assessment year 2018-19 was allowed for statistical purposes. The court found that the reduction in the provision for leave encashment was withdrawn from liability but credited to the actual amount of leave encashment paid, supporting the appellant&#039;s accounting method. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the claim to ensure compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced in Chennai on 28th June, 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2023 08:57:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=718250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 19 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439746</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the disallowance of deduction for provision for leave encashment for the assessment year 2018-19 was allowed for statistical purposes. The court found that the reduction in the provision for leave encashment was withdrawn from liability but credited to the actual amount of leave encashment paid, supporting the appellant&#039;s accounting method. The Assessing Officer was directed to re-examine the claim to ensure compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced in Chennai on 28th June, 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=439746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>